MODEL ORIENTED METHOD OF BIT ERROR RATE MEASUREMENT IN 802.11 WIRELESS NETWORKS
Nesterenko Sergiy, State Research Institute of Тests and Сertification of Armaments and Military Technique of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (1 Striletska Str., 14033 Chernihiv, Ukraine)
Nesterenko Yuliia, Odessa National Polytechnic University, Odessa, Ukraine
One of the main features of wireless networks is that they are used as transmission medium the radio channels that are affected by a lot of interference. In some cases it leads to a high bit error rate (BER) level in the channel which significantly reduces its throughput. In the article analysis of approaches and appropriate methods for BER measurement in a wireless channel were conducted. It is shown that the methods that are used for BER measurement do not allow calculate BER value with sufficient accuracy. In the article an original model oriented method of BER measurement is proposed. BER calculation is performed using a mathematical model of wireless channel throughput. As the mathematical model is used a modified model of wireless channel with retransmissions. As a basic metric for BER level calculation is used experimentally measured throughput of the wireless channel. Experimental assess of method accuracy was conducted. Analysis of method accuracy shows that the proposed method allows with a high accuracy calculate the average value of the wireless channel BER level.
802.11 wireless networks, bit error rate calculation, model oriented method, traffic generator, wireless channel throughput
1. 802.11 Wireless LAN Performance. Qualcomm White Paper. (2013), 13 p. Available at: http://www.qca.qualcomm.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/.
2. Vlavianos A., Law L., Broustis I., Krishnamurthy S., Faloutsos M. Assessing Link Quality in IEEE 802.11 Wireless Networks: Which is the Right Metric? 2008, 6 p. Available at: http://www.cs.ucr.edu/~krish/pimrc08.pdf.
3. Battula B., Prasad R., Moulana M. (2001). Performance Analysis of IEEE 802.11 Non-Saturated DCF, International Journal of Computer Science Issues, (8), pp. 565–568.
4. Halperin D., Hu W., Sheth A., Wetherall D. Predictable 802.11 Packet Delivery from Wireless Channel Measurements, in: SIGCOMM’10, New Delhi, India (2010), pp. 123–136.
5. IEEE 802.11 standard, Part 11 (2012). Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications.
6. Nesterenko, S., Nesterenko, I. (2015). Analysis of IEEE 802.11g wireless channel maximum throughput. Electrotechnic and Computer Systems, (2), pp. 42–46.
7. Khan, M., Khan, T., Beg, M. (2013). Evaluating the performance of IEEE 802.11 WLAN using DCF with RTS/CTS mechanism. International Journal of Electrical, Electronics & Comm. Eng., (2), pp. 264–271.
8. Sharma R., Singh G., Agnihorti R. (2010). Comparison of performance analysis of 802.11a, 802.11b and 802.11g standard. International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering, (2), pp. 2042–2046.
9. Nesterenko, S., Nesterenko, I. (2015). Throughput analysis of 802.11g wireless channel boosting modes. Electrotechnic and Computer Systems, (3), pp. 54–57.
10. Feng Li, Mingzhe Li, Rui Lu, Huahui Wu, Mark Claypool and Robert Kinicki. Tools and Techniques for Measurement of IEEE 802.11 Wireless Networks, in: Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks, 4th International Symposium, (2006), pp. 1–8.