THE STRUCTURE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OF TEXT DOCUMENTS COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Author:

Vavilenkova Anastasiіa, National Aviation University (1 Kosmonavta Komarova Av., 03068 Kyiv, Ukraine)

Language: ukrainian

Annotation:

The article analyzes the existing software of plagiarism search in electronic text documents, allowing to identify the main shortcomings of intellectual analysis of textual information. The research is aimed on reducing these shortcomings using a proposed structure of information technology of text documents comparative analysis. Its major units include a user interface, module of constructing a logic and linguistic model of natural language text documents, linguistic processor for constructing linguistic components of text documents, linguistic processor of the system of automated formation of logic and linguistic models of natural language sentences, module of linguistic components comparison, module of semantic-syntactic components comparison. The paper argued the role of each unit in extracting context information from the compared texts.

Key words:

natural language, logic and linguistic model, context analysis, linguistic processor, knowledge base

References:

1Vavilenkova, A. I. (2015). Osnovnye printcipy sinteza logiko-lingvisticheskikh modelei [The basic principles of the synthesis of logical-linguistic models]. Kibernetika i sistemnyi analiz – Cybernetics and systems analysis, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 176185 (in Ukrainian).

2. Barsegian, A. A., Kupriianov, M. S., Stepanenko, V. V., Kholod, I. I. (2007). Metody i modeli analiza dannykh: OLAP i Data Mining [Methods and models of data analysis: OLAP and Data Mining]. Saint-Petersburg: BKhV-Peterbrg, p. 384 (in Russian).

3. Onlain-servis proverki teksta na unikalnost (2016). [Online service of text for uniqueness validation]. Retrieved from: www.text.ru.

4. Advego Plagiatus – proverka unikalnosti teksta (2008–2016) [Advego Plagiatus – checking the text for uniqueness]. Retrieved from: http://advego.ru/plagiatus/top/.

5. Jurafsky D. (2012). Professor of Linguistics, Christopher Manning, Associate Professor of Computer Science Natural Language Processing, Stanford University. Retrieved from: http://online.stanford.edu/node/95

6. Slovnyky Ukrainy on-lain (2001–2014) [Online Dictionaries of Ukraine]. Retrieved from: http://lcorp.ulif.org.ua/dictua/.

7. Rassel S., Norvig, P. (2015). Iskusstvennyi intellekt: sovremennyi podkhod (AIMA-2) [Artificial intelligence: a modern approach (AIMA-2)]. (2 nd ed). Moscow: Viliams, p. 1408 (in Russian)

8. Kormen, T., Charlz, I., Leizerson, Rivest, Ronald L., Shtain, K. (2013). Algoritmy: postroenie i analiz [Algorithms: construction and analysis]. (3 rd ed). Moscow: Viliams, p. 1328 (in Russian)

9. BelousovKI. (2012). Teoriia i metodologiia polistrukturnogo sinteza teksta [Theory and Methodology of polystructural text synthesis]. (2 nd ed). Moscow: FLINTAp. 214 (in Russian).

10. ShyrokovVA., BuhakovOV., HriaznukhinaTOet al. (2005). Korpusna linhvistyka [Corpus linguistics]. KyivDovirap. 471 (in Ukrainian).

11.NikitinMV. (2007). Kurs lingvisticheskoi semantiki [Linguistic Semantics Course]. Saint-PetersburgRGPU imGertcenap. 819 (in Russian).

12.Marchuk, Iu. N. (2007). Kompiuternaia lingvistika [Computational linguistics]. Moscow: AST: Vostok –Zapad, 3 (in Russian).

13.Vavilenkova, A. I. (2015). Porivnialnyi analiz rechen pryrodnoi movy za zmistom [Comparative analysis of the proposals of natural language by content]. Matematychni mashyny ta systemy – Mathematical machines and systems, no. 2, pp. 97–103 (in Ukrainian).

14.Vavilenkova, A. I. (2014). The formal model of knowledge retrieval and processingBlack Sea Scientific journal of academic researchvol. 16, pp.115119.

Download